Author:
Towards the last week of February every year, media reports carry the hype of the union budget and its speculations. The Finance Minister is expected to deliver the âmagic wandâ.
For a full week after the budget speech of the Finance Minister in the parliament, all kinds of meetings, media commentary and debates focus on what the union budget implies for the people of this country. Standard comments every year comprise of:
" pro-poor budgetâ, "anti-poor budgetâ, "pro-business budgetâ, "no relief to middle classâ,
" nothing for SC & ST in the budgetâ, "disappointed with lack of long-term perspectiveâ,
"nothing for this state or that regionâ, "budget aimed at coming electionsâ, etc. etc.
This year was no exception. After the hype a week before and a week after the presentation of the Union Budget, there is no further debate on issues that matter to people of the country.
In this cacophony, several crucial aspects have been generally ignored.
First, recommendations of the Fourteenth Finance Commission have significantly shifted the focus of budgetary exercise to state governments. Many national development schemes & programmes have been taken off the central governmentâs list, and handed over to states. With the closure of the Planning Commission, it is expected that planning function would now devolve to the states. However, the State Planning Boards in most states have remained a paper institution. Planning capacity in many states is generally weak. With additional resources at their command (and more flowing from coal block auctions to some states), there is an urgent need to strengthen this planning capacity. Therefore, focus of attention should be to analyse budgets of state governments.
However, such scrutiny of budgets of state governments by academia, media and civil society is few and far between.
Second, the Fourteenth Finance Commission has devolved nearly 2.87 lakh crores (about $ 50 bn) to panchayats and municipalities. This amount is nearly three times of what the 13th Finance Commission had recommended. These funds are in addition to funds devolved by state governments. Do Zila Parishads, Panchayat Samitis and Gram Panchayats have capacity to plan and utilise these funds adequately? Do municipalities have competence to plan and implement basic services for all their citizens?
There is no scrutiny of local government budgets by media, civil society and economists; why?
Third, the Constitution of India provides for District Planning Committees (DPCs) mandated to develop plans for âeconomic development and social justiceâ in the district. These bodies have not even been properly constituted, let alone functioning effectively. With greater devolution of development funds with local governments, DPCs should be enabled and empowered to play a stronger role in ensuring planned utilisations of resources.
In the lives of most citizens, local governments in rural and urban areas are the first point of encounter in accessing basic socio-economic services and programmes. Should their budgets and plans not be the focus of most serious and timely scrutiny? Should the âfinance ministersâ of local governments not be interviewed by various media about their budgets and plans?
As the challenge of implementation on the ground continues, union budget, and its associated debates, will have any relevance only when budgets and plans of local and state governments are simultaneously scrutinised by citizens and experts.
Rajesh Tandon, Founder-President, PRIA New Delhi, March 12, 2015
This blog was first published on www.dnaindia.com.
This blog, by Dr. Anshuman Karol, explores why the future of higher education depends on community-engaged research, global collaboration, and knowledge democracy. It highlights how Community-Based Participatory Research enables universities and communities to co-create solutions for today's interconnected social and environmental challenges.
EpiNet: Education, Epistemic Justice and the Knowledge Commons
Reflecting on conversations at the Silver Jubilee of APMAS, Dr. Rajesh Tandon revisits five decades of collaboration between civil society and government institutions. Drawing on experiences from education policy, participatory planning, Panchayati Raj, and voter awareness initiatives, he highlights how mutual respect and shared expertise have been the foundation of impactful partnerships.
.png)
.png)
.png)